Wally Bock's Monday Memo
 
 
 
         

Search the Site Using Keywords



Handle Your Subscription


Subscribe Unsubscribe

Resources
Check Out Wally's New Book
Ask Wally a Question

Dog Walking, Crime Fighting and Responsibility

Shakespeare the Bassett leads me on walks around Wilmington at various times during the day.

When you're out dog walking you notice a lot of different things because your mind is free to roam. But there's one thing you almost always notice. Some folks clean up after their dogs and some don't.

I spotted one young man walking away from a pile his dog had left and offered him one of the bags I carry for clean-up purposes. He declined. After all, he lectured me, "It just makes sense not to clean up after my dog. It's messy and smelly. And there's plenty of places he can go next time." Philosophers and systems theorists might call this "The Tragedy of the Commons." I call it "The Rule of Doggie Deposits."

If we all act like my young friend, after a while there are little doggie piles everywhere and what used to be a nice place to walk isn't so nice anymore. The wonderful clean space we started with becomes messy, smelly and awful.

If you want to be responsible, you should what your mother told you. Clean up after yourself and your dog.

Cleaning up does more than just make it easy to walk without looking down. Keeping the neighborhood clean can also prevent crime. We've known this for at least twenty years, but very few communities have done much about it. One that did was New York City, with rather astounding results.

When Rudy Giuliani took over as Mayor of New York City, the generally accepted wisdom was that the city was essentially ungovernable and its crime was uncontrollable. Rudy disagreed.

By the time he left office, New York was one of the safest major cities on the planet. The crime rate had been more than cut in half. Mostly that happened by paying attention to an essay first published back in the early 1980s called "Broken Windows: the Police and Neighborhood Safety."

The essay was written by James Q. Wilson and George Kelling, who said that, "at the community level, disorder and crime are inextricably linked, in a kind of developmental sequence." The symbol of disorder was the broken window.

In neighborhoods where people care about each other and the neighborhood broken windows don't stay broken long. They get fixed. But let one broken window go un-repaired and it's soon joined by others. Things get worse. Start fixing the windows and things start to get better.

Kelling and Wilson also pointed out that, for most people, a confrontation with a drunk or a crowd of rowdy teenagers produces as much anxiety and fear as the prospect of meeting a robber. And where disreputable behavior is allowed to flourish, crime follows.

They suggested that paying attention to maintenance and disorderly behavior would have an effect on crime. Those were the tactics that worked in New York City. It meant paying attention to graffiti and maintenance and it meant enforcing the laws about rowdy behavior. Ultimately, it meant holding people like you and me accountable for our actions.

We don't do accountability and responsibility well any more. Instead of taking responsibility for our own mess and yards and neighborhoods, we've gotten very good at expecting some kind of magic to solve our problems for us.

We expect the government to do things for us. And we expect that even if we're not willing to do the work of citizens and study the issues and vote.

We expect some kind of magic pill or program to solve our problems for us. We want to take a pill to get rid of heartburn rather than even consider changing our diet or lifestyle. We look for the program that will let us lose weight without dieting or exercise.

And if all else fails, we can follow the new American way and sue anyone we think might be responsible for doing us ill, especially if they have really deep pockets. We don't take it out behind the barn anymore. Now we take it to court.

We can't have the benefits of a good life or neighborhood or nation unless we're willing to do our part. We can't expect to get by on the efforts of others and then be surprised when things turn out badly.

There is no magic. It's up to us. We can start with something as simple as picking up after the dog.

Top of page

RESOURCES

Gary W. Harding has posted an excellent personal page devoted to the Tragedy of the Commons especially as it relates to population issues. It includes links to several articles and sites, including biologist Garret Hardin's classic 1968 essay on the subject.

In 2001, Forbes published an article by Daniel McFadden on the Tragedy of the Commons as it relates to the Internet.

One of the most lucid brief descriptions of the Tragedy of the Commons is included in the Appendix to Peter Senge's excellent book, The Fifth Discipline. That same appendix includes short definitions and descriptions of other types of system archetypes. The appendix alone is worth the price of the book.

The Broken Windows essay, along with several other excellent essays on crime in the US can be found in James Q. Wilson's book, Thinking About Crime.

The essay originally appeared in the Atlantic Monthly, some ten years before it was reprinted in Wilson's book. That version is on the web.

George Kelling (co-author with Wilson) of the Broken Windows essay also co-authored a book with Catherine Coles that provides more historical background and prescriptive text than the Wilson book. Kelling and Coles book is called Fixing Broken Windows: Restoring Order and Reducing Crime in Our Communities.

Get the inside scoop on how Rudy Giuliani handled the crime problem in New York, along with his own analysis of what worked and what didn't during his tenure as New York City's Mayor in his excellent book, Leadership.

Got a favorite site we should tell folks about? Email Wally and tell him why you think it's a great one.

Top of page

More about Wally Bock

 

 

»»megastarmedia.com creative web site and graphic design
© 2003 Wally Bock. Click for Contact Information.